Who's Winning the Reputation

Game in Apparel?

See how Nike, Lululemon, The North Face, and others stack up across
Innovation, Trust, Perception, and Reputation.

A Comprehensive Benchmark Built on Real-World Signals & Public Opinion

Q2 2025 Brand Equity Score™ – Apparel Top 10

Rank Brand Composite BES™ Innovation Trust Perception Reputation
1Levi’s90.013.657.478.969.3
2Nike89.715.656.475.070.8
3Adidas87.913.254.373.568.3
4Old Navy84.111.250.567.861.3
5The North Face80.39.642.557.764.3
6Ralph Lauren79.39.239.456.365.3
7Dior74.59.232.544.261.3
8H&M71.78.029.539.556.8
9Lululemon70.67.627.233.061.7
10Vuori60.02.88.314.055.3
High (85+) Moderate (70–84.9) Low (<70)

Dig Deeper: Brand-by-Brand Analysis

Click any brand to view its full profile, including quantitative insights from public surveys and qualitative signals from media sentiment.

Levi's

Levi’s converts universal recognition into category-leading perception and reputation.

With near-universal awareness and durable brand goodwill, Levi’s leads the apparel category on perception and reputation, backed by strong trust and value clarity. The Brand Equity Score™ reflects a balanced, heritage-rich profile — steady advocacy and a sizable “movable middle” that can be activated through innovation storytelling and community engagement.

This BES snapshot shows why Levi’s remains a benchmark for brand heritage while still having headroom to elevate innovation salience and expand usage frequency.

— MeasuredI/O BES Insights Team

Dimension Levi’s Score Category Leader Gap
Innovation 13.6 Nike – 15.6 –2.0
Trust 57.4 Levi’s – 57.4
Perception 78.9 Levi’s – 78.9
Reputation 69.3 Nike – 70.8 –1.5
Composite 90.0 90.0
    = Critical Gap (30+ pts)     |         = Moderate Gap (15–30 pts)

Quantitative Lens — Levi’s (Q2 2025)

MeasuredI/O’s quantitative lens blends public sentiment indicators with brand engagement benchmarks to evaluate brand health. These scores reflect favorability, trust, and perceived value across core equity dimensions. Levi’s leads the apparel category in perception and reputation, with near-universal awareness and a balanced profile that combines heritage strength with strong customer advocacy.

Metric Score Insight
Awareness95%Near-universal familiarity across demographics
Favorability76%High goodwill anchored in brand heritage
Trust Index61%Trusted for quality, durability, and style
Perceived Value67%Seen as offering strong value at its price point
Brand Advocacy Index™+41 NPSStrong advocacy from loyal customers

Brand Alignment Gap Index™ (BAGI™)

Minor Gap observed. Levi’s innovation perception trails category leaders, but trust, value, and reputation remain tightly aligned with its earned media narrative. Advocacy levels are strong, indicating a solid foundation for brand health.

Moderate alignment — trust and reputation strong, innovation perception lagging

Insight: Levi’s is in a position of strength. Closing the innovation gap with high-visibility product launches and sustainability-driven storytelling will ensure continued category leadership.

Qualitative Lens — Levi’s (Earned Media Signals, Q2 2025)

Levi’s earned media profile is anchored in heritage, authenticity, and quality. Media coverage emphasizes the brand’s cultural relevance and consistent product excellence, though innovation-focused narratives appear less frequently than for younger, trend-driven competitors.

Category Media Narrative Equity Impact
Innovation Product quality focus, limited breakthrough tech stories Moderate lift — innovation perception opportunity
Trust & Ethics Strong reputation for durability and responsible sourcing Strengthens trust and value perceptions
Corporate Culture Heritage brand with stable, consistent leadership Reinforces brand stability but lacks disruptive energy
Community Impact Local engagement and sustainability programs Positive perception with room to expand media reach

High volume, heritage and quality narrative dominant, innovation less emphasized

Insight: Levi’s media narrative consistently reinforces quality and authenticity. Expanding innovation-forward messaging — particularly in sustainability and product design — can lift innovation perception to match its strengths in trust and reputation.


Brand Equity Opportunity – Levi’s

What to Leverage:

  • Category-leading perception (78.9) and strong reputation (69.3) position Levi’s as the most respected heritage brand in apparel.
  • Near-universal awareness (95%) and high favorability (76%) ensure deep market penetration and cross-generational appeal.
  • Strong trust (61%) and perceived value (67%) reinforce Levi’s image as durable, high-quality, and worth the price.

What to Watch:

  • Innovation score (13.6) lags behind category leaders, limiting salience in trend-driven fashion and product innovation narratives.
  • Earned media narrative heavily emphasizes heritage and authenticity, with fewer high-impact stories on breakthrough design or sustainability leadership.
  • Half of the market are non-users despite strong awareness, signaling a need for targeted activation to re-engage lapsed or light customers.

Recommended Strategic Focus:
Maintain and amplify Levi’s core strengths in perception and reputation while elevating its innovation narrative. Increase visibility of sustainable design innovations, limited-edition collaborations, and fit/technology advancements through high-profile product launches, influencer partnerships, and cultural moments. Expanding lifestyle and ESG storytelling will broaden relevance with younger demographics and convert high awareness into higher usage frequency.

The Public Signal Gap Index™ (PSGI™) compares what the public thinks (survey data) with what the media says (earned media signals). This diagnostic highlights alignment—or misalignment—across trust, innovation, reputation, and perception.

BES Dimension Survey Signal Media Signal Risk Level
Trust 61% trust Coverage emphasizes durability, fit quality, and responsible sourcing — reinforcing consumer confidence Low
Innovation 13.6 score Fewer breakthrough design/tech stories; innovation narrative under-weighted vs. heritage and authenticity Moderate
Reputation 69.3 score Stable legacy framing; positive sentiment in brand-level narratives and customer loyalty signals Low
Perception 78.9 score Earned media is net positive but heavy on neutral coverage; fewer culture-driving moments than potential Moderate

PSGI™ compares public perception signals with earned media sentiment to detect potential brand alignment risks.
Moderate = Opportunity to realign narrative and close trust/innovation gaps
Low = Public signal and media narrative in alignment

Nike

Nike converts universal recognition into category-best reputation with broad favorability and advocacy.

With near-total awareness and strong goodwill, Nike anchors apparel on reputation and advocacy, supported by solid trust and value clarity. The Brand Equity Score™ reflects a powerful, culture-driving profile with room to amplify innovation salience and translate awareness into deeper engagement.

This BES snapshot shows why Nike sets the pace on cultural relevance and performance heritage while still having headroom to lift innovation perception.

— MeasuredI/O BES Insights Team

Dimension Nike Score Category Leader Gap
Innovation 15.6 Nike – 15.6
Trust 56.4 Levi’s – 57.4 –1.0
Perception 75.0 Levi’s – 78.9 –3.9
Reputation 70.8 Nike – 70.8
Composite 89.7 Levi’s – 90.0 –0.3
    = Critical Gap (30+ pts)     |         = Moderate Gap (15–30 pts)

Quantitative Lens — Nike (Q2 2025)

MeasuredI/O’s quantitative lens blends public sentiment indicators with brand engagement benchmarks to evaluate brand health. Nike shows near-universal awareness with strong favorability, trust, and value clarity, translating into one of the category’s highest reputation scores and robust advocacy.

Metric Score Insight
Awareness97%Near-universal brand familiarity
Favorability73%Strong goodwill across segments
Trust Index60%Solid trust; opportunity to deepen confidence
Perceived Value63%Value seen in quality/innovation; watch price sensitivity
Brand Advocacy Index™+44 NPSHealthy advocacy and word-of-mouth potential

Brand Alignment Gap Index™ (BAGI™)

Notable Gap observed. Positive consumer buzz is high, but earned-media net tone is more muted. Aligning high-advocacy stories with press narratives will improve coherence across channels.

Mixed alignment — strong buzz and advocacy; earned tone skews neutral

Insight: Nike is structurally strong. Elevating innovation proof points (materials, performance science, sustainability) and tightening value storytelling can convert awareness into higher frequency and lift trust further.

Qualitative Lens — Nike (Earned Media Signals, Q2 2025)

Nike’s earned-media narrative centers on performance, athlete partnerships, and cultural relevance. Coverage is broadly positive but leans neutral in volume terms, suggesting room to create more breakthrough moments that spotlight innovation and social impact at scale.

Category Media Narrative Equity Impact
Innovation Performance tech and athlete-led design; sustainability stories emerging Moderate lift — opportunity to spotlight R&D proof more consistently
Trust & Ethics Quality and performance lead; pricing/value scrutiny appears episodically Maintains trust; value narrative can be sharpened
Corporate Culture Elite performance ethos; employer brand sentiment mixed Stable leadership image; room to strengthen pride metrics
Community Impact Local investments and athlete/community programs Positive impact perception; scale and localize stories

High volume, culturally resonant; innovation and ESG stories can punch through more

Insight: Create bigger “proof moments” (materials science, circularity, athlete R&D) to increase innovation salience, while amplifying local community programs to lift trust and employer pride.


Brand Equity Opportunity – Nike

What to Leverage:

  • Industry-best reputation (70.8) and robust advocacy (NPS +44) anchored by performance heritage.
  • Near-universal awareness (97%) and strong favorability (73%) provide broad activation canvas.
  • Positive community impact perception (53%) supports both consumer and employer narratives.

What to Watch:

  • Earned tone leans neutral (56.6% neutral; 31.5% positive), muting innovation salience.
  • Value sensitivity persists despite 63% “good value”; sharpen proof around quality, longevity, and sustainability.
  • Engagement gap: ~45% report no usage/accounts — focus on conversion and frequency.

Recommended Strategic Focus:
Convert awareness into higher frequency with value-forward storytelling and experiential programs. Create breakthrough, proof-heavy innovation moments (materials, circularity, athlete science) and localize community impact to lift trust and employer pride concurrently.

The Public Signal Gap Index™ (PSGI™) compares what the public thinks (survey data) with what the media says (earned media signals). This diagnostic highlights alignment—or misalignment—across trust, innovation, reputation, and perception.

BES Dimension Survey Signal Media Signal Risk Level
Trust 60% trust Coverage highlights performance quality; periodic scrutiny on price/value Low
Innovation 15.6 score Innovation stories present but diluted by high neutral volume; more proof-led narratives needed Moderate
Reputation 70.8 score Strong legacy and performance framing drive consistent positive sentiment Low
Perception 75.0 score Broadly favorable, but share-of-voice is tempered by neutral coverage; opportunity for bigger cultural “moments” Moderate

PSGI™ compares public perception signals with earned media sentiment to detect potential brand alignment risks.
Moderate = Opportunity to realign narrative and close trust/innovation gaps
Low = Public signal and media narrative in alignment

Adidas

Adidas pairs mass recognition with strong favorability and reputation—poised to convert a large neutral middle.

With 95% awareness and 71% favorability, Adidas holds a broad base of goodwill. The Brand Equity Score™ reflects a durable, mainstream profile—solid trust and reputation with room to sharpen innovation salience and convert non-users through value and community narratives.

This BES snapshot explains why Adidas remains a cultural mainstay while retaining headroom to close small gaps to the leaders on perception and reputation.

— MeasuredI/O BES Insights Team

Dimension Adidas Score Category Leader Gap
Innovation 13.2 Nike – 15.6 –2.4
Trust 54.3 Levi’s – 57.4 –3.1
Perception 73.5 Levi’s – 78.9 –5.4
Reputation 68.3 Nike – 70.8 –2.5
Composite 87.9 Levi’s – 90.0 –2.1
    = Critical Gap (30+ pts)     |         = Moderate Gap (15–30 pts)

Quantitative Lens — Adidas (Q2 2025)

MeasuredI/O’s quantitative lens blends public sentiment indicators with brand engagement benchmarks to evaluate brand health. Adidas combines very high awareness with strong favorability and a solid trust/value profile. Reputation remains robust, while innovation salience and conversion from awareness to usage present the clearest upsides.

Metric Score Insight
Awareness95%Household-name recognition
Favorability71%Broad goodwill with a sizable neutral middle
Trust Index58%Solid trust; 30% unsure indicates messaging headroom
Perceived Value62%Price–quality balance generally well-received
Brand Advocacy Index™+39 NPSHealthy advocacy; activation can lift referrals

Brand Alignment Gap Index™ (BAGI™)

Moderate Gap observed. Consumer buzz is positive but not yet amplified by earned-media tone at scale. Sharpening breakthrough stories (innovation & sustainability) can lift alignment.

Moderate alignment — trust/value strong; innovation salience can rise

Insight: Adidas is well-positioned. Targeted campaigns to convert the neutral middle, plus louder proof-led innovation and community stories, will narrow small gaps to category leaders.

Qualitative Lens — Adidas (Earned Media Signals, Q2 2025)

Adidas’ earned-media narrative leans into sport heritage, performance credibility, and selective sustainability themes. Coverage is broadly positive with a high neutral share, suggesting opportunity to generate more culturally resonant, innovation-forward moments.

Category Media Narrative Equity Impact
Innovation Athlete-led design, materials R&D; sustainability innovations emerging Moderate lift — needs higher-share proof moments
Trust & Ethics Quality/performance coverage; occasional price/value scrutiny Supports trust; clarify value and responsible sourcing
Corporate Culture Performance-first culture; employer pride mixed Stable; room to strengthen pride narrative
Community Impact Sport/community initiatives with selective amplification Positive foundation; localize and scale

Medium volume, broadly positive; innovation and ESG can punch through more

Insight: Drive bigger, proof-rich stories (innovation collabs, circular design, athlete-tech) to raise innovation perception and accelerate conversion.


Brand Equity Opportunity – Adidas

What to Leverage:

  • High perception (73.5) and strong reputation (68.3) anchored in sport heritage and product credibility.
  • Mass awareness (95%) and strong favorability (71%) provide scale for conversion and frequency programs.
  • Solid trust (58%) and value (62%) with room to clarify benefits to the undecided third.

What to Watch:

  • Innovation score (13.2) trails the leader; increase proof-based innovation storytelling.
  • 54% non-user rate despite high awareness—target “movable middle” with offers and new-to-brand pathways.
  • Positive buzz (33%) exists but share-of-voice skews neutral; create bigger cultural moments.

Recommended Strategic Focus:
Keep building on reputation while elevating innovation salience via athlete-tech launches, materials science features, and sustainability proof points. Pair with targeted acquisition and loyalty levers to convert neutral/non-users and increase purchase frequency.

The Public Signal Gap Index™ (PSGI™) compares what the public thinks (survey data) with what the media says (earned media signals). This diagnostic highlights alignment—or misalignment—across trust, innovation, reputation, and perception.

BES Dimension Survey Signal Media Signal Risk Level
Trust 58% trust Quality and performance narratives are steady; clarify ethics/value to undecided audiences Low
Innovation 13.2 score Innovation coverage present but diluted by neutral share; needs higher-impact proof stories Moderate
Reputation 68.3 score Strong brand legacy and athlete associations drive positive sentiment Low
Perception 73.5 score Solid framing in sport/performance; opportunity to broaden lifestyle/culture narratives Moderate

PSGI™ compares public perception signals with earned media sentiment to detect potential brand alignment risks.
Moderate = Opportunity to realign narrative and close trust/innovation gaps
Low = Public signal and media narrative in alignment

Old Navy

Old Navy’s mass recognition and value clarity set a strong base—now poised to convert non-users and lift perception.

With 93% awareness and solid trust/value signals, Old Navy’s Brand Equity Score™ reflects a broad, family-centric profile. The brand’s headroom sits in perception and reputation vs. the category leaders—an opportunity to pair price leadership with proof of quality, inclusivity, and style.

This BES snapshot shows why Old Navy can translate reach into frequency through sharper storytelling and targeted activation.

— MeasuredI/O BES Insights Team

Dimension Old Navy Score Category Leader Gap
Innovation 11.2 Nike – 15.6 –4.4
Trust 50.5 Levi’s – 57.4 –6.9
Perception 67.8 Levi’s – 78.9 –11.1
Reputation 61.3 Nike – 70.8 –9.5
Composite 84.1 Levi’s – 90.0 –5.9
    = Critical Gap (30+ pts)     |         = Moderate Gap (15–30 pts)

Quantitative Lens — Old Navy (Q2 2025)

MeasuredI/O’s quantitative lens blends public sentiment indicators with brand engagement benchmarks to evaluate brand health. Old Navy combines near-universal awareness with strong favorability and value perceptions. The core upside: converting a sizable non-user base and elevating perception with more culturally resonant stories.

Metric Score Insight
Awareness93%Household-name familiarity across family segments
Favorability65%Broad goodwill; room to convert neutrals
Trust Index54%Solid confidence; clarify quality/ethics to the unsure third
Perceived Value62%Strong value story; reinforce quality to avoid “low-price = low quality” heuristics
Brand Advocacy Index™+25 NPSModerate advocacy; loyalty programs can amplify referrals

Brand Alignment Gap Index™ (BAGI™)

Moderate Gap observed. Consumer value/favorability trends ahead of earned-media salience; coverage volume is lower than larger peers. Boosting breakthrough product and community stories can close the alignment gap.

Moderate alignment — value strong, perception lift tied to bigger cultural moments

Insight: Old Navy is positioned to grow frequency. Pair sharp value with proof of quality, fit, and inclusivity; elevate local community initiatives to convert neutral non-users.

Qualitative Lens — Old Navy (Earned Media Signals, Q2 2025)

Earned-media coverage emphasizes affordability, family basics, and seasonal promotions. Innovation and sustainability stories appear, but with lower share and volume than bigger brands—suggesting scope to create more distinctive product and purpose narratives.

Category Media Narrative Equity Impact
Innovation Selective product updates; limited breakthrough design coverage Light lift — opportunity to spotlight fit/quality innovation
Trust & Ethics Value leadership; need clearer quality and sourcing proof Supports trust; transparency can raise confidence
Corporate Culture Accessible, family-first positioning Stable but not a talent magnet; employer pride to improve
Community Impact Local school/family initiatives with modest amplification Positive foundation; scale and localize stories

Medium volume, value-forward narrative; needs bigger product/purpose moments

Insight: Create proof-heavy campaigns (fit/durability testing, quality guarantees, community partnerships) to raise perception and advocacy in tandem.


Brand Equity Opportunity – Old Navy

What to Leverage:

  • High awareness (93%) and strong favorability (65%) yield broad reach and goodwill.
  • Value clarity (62% “good value”) and solid trust (54%) support conversion messaging.
  • Family-centric positioning aligns with audience needs across seasons and life stages.

What to Watch:

  • Perception (67.8) trails leaders; create bigger, style-led narratives to elevate salience.
  • 57% non-users despite high awareness — target neutral middle with new-to-brand offers.
  • Buzz (28%) and lower earned volume vs. larger peers limit spillover; engineer “moments.”

Recommended Strategic Focus:
Pair price leadership with proof of quality and style. Drive cultural resonance via limited-edition collabs, inclusive casting, and community partnerships. Use loyalty + family bundles to increase frequency and convert non-users.

The Public Signal Gap Index™ (PSGI™) compares what the public thinks (survey data) with what the media says (earned media signals). This diagnostic highlights alignment—or misalignment—across trust, innovation, reputation, and perception.

BES Dimension Survey Signal Media Signal Risk Level
Trust 54% trust Coverage emphasizes affordability and accessibility; clearer quality/sourcing proof can lift confidence Low
Innovation 11.2 score Limited breakthrough coverage; innovation stories get outshouted by promotions Moderate
Reputation 61.3 score Stable, value-led reputation; fewer premium cues vs. leaders Low
Perception 67.8 score Framing dominated by deals/basics; needs more style/quality storytelling Moderate

PSGI™ compares public perception signals with earned media sentiment to detect potential brand alignment risks.
Moderate = Opportunity to realign narrative and close trust/innovation gaps
Low = Public signal and media narrative in alignment

The North Face

The North Face pairs high awareness with outdoor performance authority—trust and perception scores show room to strengthen.

With 81% awareness and 55% favorability, The North Face’s Brand Equity Score™ reflects a respected position in outdoor and lifestyle markets. Trust and perception scores trail leaders, signaling the opportunity to amplify transparency, innovation, and community impact narratives.

This BES snapshot shows how elevating ESG proof, tech storytelling, and lifestyle resonance can boost brand equity across audiences.

— MeasuredI/O BES Insights Team

Dimension The North Face Score Category Leader Gap
Innovation 9.5 Nike – 15.6 –6.1
Trust 46.2 Levi’s – 57.4 –11.2
Perception 56.8 Levi’s – 78.9 –22.1
Reputation 67.5 Nike – 70.8 –3.3
Composite 77.1 Levi’s – 90.0 –12.9
    = Critical Gap (30+ pts)     |         = Moderate Gap (15–30 pts)

Quantitative Lens — The North Face (Q2 2025)

MeasuredI/O’s quantitative lens blends public sentiment indicators with brand engagement benchmarks to evaluate brand health. The North Face combines high awareness with solid reputation and favorable sentiment. The clearest upsides: lifting perception with bigger cultural moments and raising innovation salience in earned and owned channels.

Metric Score Insight
Awareness81%Strong familiarity with room to grow
Favorability55%Solid goodwill anchored in outdoor performance
Trust Index46%Confidence present; clarify ethics/quality to the unsure 43%
Perceived Value47%Value seen but under-articulated for many respondents
Brand Advocacy Index™+31 NPSPositive advocacy; broaden the promoter base

Brand Alignment Gap Index™ (BAGI™)

Moderate Gap observed. Public sentiment is favorable, but earned-media share leans neutral with limited breakthrough stories. Elevating product innovation, sustainability, and expedition/athlete proof points will tighten alignment.

Moderate alignment — reputation solid; perception/innovation under-amplified

Insight: TNF is primed to grow. Scale proof-led launches (materials, packable warmth, circular repair), and localize community/wildland stewardship stories to lift trust and value clarity.

Qualitative Lens — The North Face (Earned Media Signals, Q2 2025)

The earned-media narrative emphasizes performance, durability, and outdoor culture. Coverage is broadly positive with a high neutral share, indicating room to engineer more distinctive, innovation-forward and purpose-led moments that travel beyond the core enthusiast audience.

Category Media Narrative Equity Impact
Innovation Technical materials and performance design; limited breakthrough story share Moderate lift — opportunity to spotlight R&D and athlete-proof
Trust & Ethics Quality/durability coverage; need clearer sourcing and sustainability proof Supports trust; transparency can raise confidence
Corporate Culture Adventure-forward ethos; employer pride mixed Stable; room to elevate talent magnetism
Community Impact Outdoor access, local trail/park programs Positive base; localize and scale amplification

Medium volume; performance-positive but culturally quiet — create bigger moments

Insight: Orchestrate tentpole drops (athlete expeditions, collabs, sustainability milestones) to boost perception and innovation salience while reinforcing trust.


Brand Equity Opportunity – The North Face

What to Leverage:

  • Reputation strength (64.3) and favorable sentiment (55%) anchored in performance credibility.
  • High awareness (81%) with broad recognition across outdoor and lifestyle segments.
  • Community-positive base (39%) — stewardship and access programs resonate locally.

What to Watch:

  • Perception (57.7) trails leaders — limited culture-driving coverage vs. neutral share.
  • Innovation (9.6) under-indexes; tech stories lack breakthrough moments.
  • 65% non-users despite high awareness — conversion and frequency are the growth levers.

Recommended Strategic Focus:
Double down on proof-led innovation (materials science, durability, circular repair) and engineer larger cultural moments through athlete expeditions and purpose collabs. Localize community impact and trail access initiatives to elevate trust and value clarity while driving trial.

The Public Signal Gap Index™ (PSGI™) compares what the public thinks (survey data) with what the media says (earned media signals). This diagnostic highlights alignment—or misalignment—across trust, innovation, reputation, and perception.

BES Dimension Survey Signal Media Signal Risk Level
Trust 46% trust Coverage supports quality/durability; clearer sourcing & ESG proof can lift confidence Low
Innovation 9.6 score Technical stories present but not breakout; innovation diluted by high neutral share Moderate
Reputation 64.3 score Positive legacy and performance framing; steady sentiment Low
Perception 57.7 score Underweighted cultural moments vs. neutral coverage; opportunity to amplify Moderate

PSGI™ compares public perception signals with earned media sentiment to detect potential brand alignment risks.
Moderate = Opportunity to realign narrative and close trust/innovation gaps
Low = Public signal and media narrative in alignment

Ralph Lauren

Ralph Lauren blends prestige awareness with lifestyle authority—biggest lifts are trust-building and modern innovation salience.

With 89% awareness and 54% favorability, the Brand Equity Score™ reflects durable reputation and aspirational appeal. Trust trails leaders and innovation cues are underweighted in media—presenting clear opportunities to strengthen confidence and modernity without diluting heritage.

This BES snapshot underscores the path to align timeless craftsmanship with transparent ESG proof and design-forward storytelling.

— MeasuredI/O BES Insights Team

Dimension Ralph Lauren Score Category Leader Gap
Innovation 9.2 Nike – 15.6 –6.4
Trust 39.4 Levi’s – 57.4 –18.0
Perception 56.3 Levi’s – 78.9 –22.6
Reputation 65.3 Nike – 70.8 –5.5
Composite 79.3 Levi’s – 90.0 –10.7
    = Critical Gap (30+ pts)     |         = Moderate Gap (15–30 pts)

Quantitative Lens — Ralph Lauren (Q2 2025)

MeasuredI/O’s quantitative lens blends public sentiment indicators with brand engagement benchmarks to evaluate brand health. Ralph Lauren’s profile shows strong reputation and heritage appeal but an opportunity to boost trust and innovation salience.

Metric Score Insight
Awareness89%Widely recognized premium brand
Favorability54%Appealing to aspirational consumers; room to lift sentiment
Trust Index43%High uncertainty (44%) indicates trust-building headroom
Perceived Value45%Premium pricing needs clearer value proof
Brand Advocacy Index™+33 NPSSolid advocacy; potential to grow promoter base

Brand Alignment Gap Index™ (BAGI™)

Moderate Gap observed. Premium heritage and style leadership are core, but innovation and ESG proof points under-index in earned media. Elevating these narratives will improve alignment.

Moderate alignment — reputation stable; innovation/trust need lift

Insight: Ralph Lauren can strengthen its market position by showcasing innovation in materials/design and amplifying ESG commitments alongside its heritage storytelling.

Qualitative Lens — Ralph Lauren (Earned Media Signals, Q2 2025)

Earned-media narratives focus on luxury heritage, craftsmanship, and fashion leadership. Innovation and sustainability stories appear less often, limiting modern relevance cues.

Category Media Narrative Equity Impact
Innovation Classic design excellence; limited modern innovation coverage Light lift — modernization narrative needed
Trust & Ethics Luxury quality perception; sourcing transparency limited Opportunity to increase trust through proof and openness
Corporate Culture Prestigious, design-led culture Supports heritage but may seem traditional to younger talent
Community Impact Selective philanthropic initiatives Positive base; low media amplification

Medium volume, heritage-led; modern innovation and ESG stories underrepresented

Insight: Build relevance with innovation-forward storytelling and transparent sustainability reporting to complement luxury heritage.


Brand Equity Opportunity – Ralph Lauren

What to Leverage:

  • Strong reputation (65.3) and perception (56.3) within premium fashion.
  • High awareness (89%) and heritage prestige drive aspirational appeal.
  • Solid advocacy (NPS +33) offers a base to expand promoter reach.

What to Watch:

  • Trust (39.4) significantly trails leaders — build transparency and responsible sourcing narratives.
  • Innovation (9.2) lacks presence; introduce modern, design-led proof stories.
  • Perception gap vs. leaders — cultural relevance needs reinforcing with younger audiences.

Recommended Strategic Focus:
Maintain heritage appeal while modernizing relevance: amplify innovative design processes, expand sustainability leadership, and activate cultural partnerships to refresh the brand story for new demographics.

The Public Signal Gap Index™ (PSGI™) compares what the public thinks (survey data) with what the media says (earned media signals). This diagnostic highlights alignment—or misalignment—across trust, innovation, reputation, and perception.

BES Dimension Survey Signal Media Signal Risk Level
Trust 43% trust Luxury quality perception; sourcing and ESG proof limited Moderate
Innovation 9.2 score Innovation narratives rare; design modernity underplayed Moderate
Reputation 65.3 score Heritage prestige and quality perception maintain positive sentiment Low
Perception 56.3 score Positive within loyal base; needs cultural refresh to attract younger audiences Moderate

PSGI™ compares public perception signals with earned media sentiment to detect potential brand alignment risks.
Moderate = Opportunity to realign narrative and close trust/innovation gaps
Low = Public signal and media narrative in alignment

Dior

Dior’s luxury heritage drives prestige awareness—headroom exists in trust, value clarity, and innovation salience.

With 80% awareness and 42% favorability, Dior’s Brand Equity Score™ reflects strong recognition in luxury. The lift opportunity is to raise trust and perceived value while increasing innovation visibility for stronger cultural relevance.

This BES snapshot highlights Dior’s path to align heritage storytelling with modern innovation and transparency to deepen consumer confidence.

— MeasuredI/O BES Insights Team

Dimension Dior Score Category Leader Gap
Innovation 9.2 Nike – 15.6 –6.4
Trust 32.5 Levi’s – 57.4 –24.9
Perception 44.2 Levi’s – 78.9 –34.7
Reputation 61.3 Nike – 70.8 –9.5
Composite 74.5 Levi’s – 90.0 –15.5
    = Critical Gap (30+ pts)     |         = Moderate Gap (15–30 pts)

Quantitative Lens — Dior (Q2 2025)

MeasuredI/O’s quantitative lens blends public sentiment indicators with brand engagement benchmarks to evaluate brand health. Dior enjoys luxury prestige and high awareness but shows opportunity in lifting trust, value, and innovation scores to compete more effectively in the modern luxury landscape.

Metric Score Insight
Awareness80%Strong global luxury recognition
Favorability42%Appeal to luxury consumers; large neutral segment
Trust Index36%Over half of respondents uncertain — trust building needed
Perceived Value37%Premium pricing lacks clear value proof for many
Brand Advocacy Index™+25 NPSModerate advocacy; scope to lift promoter share

Brand Alignment Gap Index™ (BAGI™)

Moderate Gap observed. Dior’s heritage and style leadership are established, but trust and innovation cues under-index in earned-media narratives.

Moderate alignment — heritage strong; modern relevance needs lift

Insight: Elevating transparent sourcing, sustainability leadership, and product innovation proof can strengthen trust and relevance among new luxury buyers.

Qualitative Lens — Dior (Earned Media Signals, Q2 2025)

Earned-media narratives center on luxury fashion, craftsmanship, and heritage prestige. Innovation-forward content is sparse, limiting modern resonance and competitive differentiation in the fast-evolving luxury market.

Category Media Narrative Equity Impact
Innovation Craftsmanship focus; limited coverage of technological or design innovation Minimal lift — opportunity to modernize innovation image
Trust & Ethics Luxury quality; sourcing transparency rarely discussed Potential to strengthen trust with clearer ESG proof
Corporate Culture Prestige and exclusivity positioning Supports heritage image; may limit accessibility perception
Community Impact Selective high-profile philanthropic efforts Positive but niche in reach and amplification

Medium volume, heritage-driven; innovation and ESG stories underrepresented

Insight: Modernize media footprint with innovation showcases and transparent sustainability leadership to match luxury peers evolving faster in these spaces.


Brand Equity Opportunity – Dior

What to Leverage:

  • Luxury heritage and craftsmanship elevate brand prestige globally.
  • Strong awareness (80%) ensures high market familiarity.
  • Reputation score (61.3) supported by quality perception among core buyers.

What to Watch:

  • Trust (32.5) and Perceived Value (37%) trail luxury peers — transparency and value proof are critical.
  • Innovation (9.2) underrepresented in media narratives; limited modernity cues.
  • Large neutral segment limits advocacy potential; conversion to promoters needed.

Recommended Strategic Focus:
Preserve heritage while modernizing brand relevance. Elevate innovation storytelling, expand ESG proof points, and drive inclusive cultural moments to engage younger luxury consumers.

The Public Signal Gap Index™ (PSGI™) compares what the public thinks (survey data) with what the media says (earned media signals). This diagnostic highlights alignment—or misalignment—across trust, innovation, reputation, and perception.

BES Dimension Survey Signal Media Signal Risk Level
Trust 36% trust Quality perception solid; transparency and ESG coverage minimal Moderate
Innovation 9.2 score Craftsmanship focus overshadows innovation narratives Moderate
Reputation 61.3 score Prestige heritage sustains positive sentiment Low
Perception 44.2 score Luxury-led framing lacks modern cultural connection High

PSGI™ compares public perception signals with earned media sentiment to detect potential brand alignment risks.
High = Significant misalignment in public vs. media signals
Moderate = Opportunity to close trust/innovation gaps
Low = Public signal and media narrative in alignment

H&M

H&M’s global recognition and affordability positioning provide scale—opportunity lies in lifting trust, value clarity, and perception.

With 73% awareness and 37% favorability, H&M’s Brand Equity Score™ reflects broad reach but a sizable neutral base. While value perceptions are present, trust and perception trail leaders—innovation salience and ethical sourcing visibility can close the gap.

This BES snapshot shows how integrating quality, sustainability, and design proof points can unlock conversion and advocacy.

— MeasuredI/O BES Insights Team

Dimension H&M Score Category Leader Gap
Innovation 8.0 Nike – 15.6 –7.6
Trust 29.5 Levi’s – 57.4 –27.9
Perception 39.5 Levi’s – 78.9 –39.4
Reputation 56.8 Nike – 70.8 –14.0
Composite 71.7 Levi’s – 90.0 –18.3
    = Critical Gap (30+ pts)     |         = Moderate Gap (15–30 pts)

Quantitative Lens — H&M (Q2 2025)

MeasuredI/O’s quantitative lens blends public sentiment indicators with brand engagement benchmarks to evaluate brand health. H&M’s high awareness and value positioning are tempered by lower trust and perception scores. Elevating quality, innovation, and ethical sourcing narratives will help close these gaps.

Metric Score Insight
Awareness73%Strong global recognition in fast fashion
Favorability37%Large neutral segment offers conversion potential
Trust Index33%Over half unsure — room to strengthen trust
Perceived Value37%Affordable but quality perceptions vary
Brand Advocacy Index™+16 NPSLower advocacy; loyalty drivers need reinforcement

Brand Alignment Gap Index™ (BAGI™)

High Gap observed. Affordability resonates with consumers, but earned-media narratives underrepresent quality, innovation, and ESG progress—leading to weaker perception and trust alignment.

High misalignment — affordability strong; innovation and trust cues lag

Insight: H&M must rebalance its narrative by integrating quality, sustainable design, and innovation proof points alongside price leadership.

Qualitative Lens — H&M (Earned Media Signals, Q2 2025)

Earned-media narratives focus on affordability, seasonal collections, and collaborations. Quality, innovation, and ESG progress are less emphasized, weakening alignment with consumer aspirations.

Category Media Narrative Equity Impact
Innovation Focus on collaborations and seasonal updates Light lift — innovation narrative underdeveloped
Trust & Ethics Sourcing transparency and ESG reporting inconsistent Weakens trust despite affordability advantage
Corporate Culture Fast-paced, trend-led culture Supports agility but may raise sustainability concerns
Community Impact Limited coverage of local/community initiatives Missed opportunity to lift reputation

Medium volume, affordability-led; quality, innovation, and ESG underrepresented

Insight: Integrate proof-led quality, sustainability, and innovation content into major campaigns to improve trust and perception alignment.


Brand Equity Opportunity – H&M

What to Leverage:

  • Strong global brand awareness (73%) and wide distribution footprint.
  • Affordability positioning appeals to broad segments.
  • Collaborations and trend responsiveness maintain relevance.

What to Watch:

  • Low trust score (29.5) and perception (39.5) compared to leaders.
  • Innovation (8.0) underrepresented in earned-media coverage.
  • Sustainability and ESG efforts not consistently visible to consumers.

Recommended Strategic Focus:
Elevate quality and ESG narratives to bolster trust and perception. Launch high-profile sustainability initiatives and integrate innovation stories into mainstream campaigns to shift consumer sentiment and attract advocates.

The Public Signal Gap Index™ (PSGI™) compares what the public thinks (survey data) with what the media says (earned media signals). This diagnostic highlights alignment—or misalignment—across trust, innovation, reputation, and perception.

BES Dimension Survey Signal Media Signal Risk Level
Trust 33% trust Affordability emphasized; inconsistent quality/ESG proof in media High
Innovation 8.0 score Limited breakthrough stories; collabs drive trend but not innovation leadership High
Reputation 56.8 score Stable within loyal shoppers; weaker with premium/value-seeking segments Moderate
Perception 39.5 score Dominated by affordability; lacks quality and innovation emphasis High

PSGI™ compares public perception signals with earned media sentiment to detect potential brand alignment risks.
High = Significant misalignment in public vs. media signals
Moderate = Opportunity to close trust/innovation gaps
Low = Public signal and media narrative in alignment

Lululemon

Lululemon’s premium athleisure profile delivers strong reputation—trust, value, and innovation perception present lift opportunities.

With 72% awareness but a high non-user rate (76%), Lululemon’s Brand Equity Score™ reflects a loyal niche base with headroom to expand. While reputation and product quality perceptions are solid, trust, value clarity, and innovation salience trail the leaders.

This BES snapshot shows why Lululemon can grow by balancing exclusivity with accessibility, and amplifying its innovation and ESG leadership stories.

— MeasuredI/O BES Insights Team

Dimension Lululemon Score Category Leader Gap
Innovation 7.6 Nike – 15.6 –8.0
Trust 27.2 Levi’s – 57.4 –30.2
Perception 33.0 Levi’s – 78.9 –45.9
Reputation 61.7 Nike – 70.8 –9.1
Composite 70.6 Levi’s – 90.0 –19.4
    = Critical Gap (30+ pts)     |         = Moderate Gap (15–30 pts)

Quantitative Lens — Lululemon (Q2 2025)

MeasuredI/O’s quantitative lens blends public sentiment indicators with brand engagement benchmarks to evaluate brand health. Lululemon’s strong brand reputation is offset by lower trust, value, and innovation perceptions. Large non-user and neutral segments provide growth opportunities.

Metric Score Insight
Awareness72%Strong in core markets; room to expand reach
Favorability31%High neutrality signals conversion potential
Trust Index31%Over half unsure — trust building essential
Perceived Value31%Premium pricing needs stronger value articulation
Brand Advocacy Index™+26 NPSLoyal advocates present; base can expand

Brand Alignment Gap Index™ (BAGI™)

High Gap observed. Reputation outpaces trust, perception, and innovation in media narratives. More proof-led product, ESG, and design stories needed.

High misalignment — reputation strong; innovation/trust need lift

Insight: Focus on trust-building via transparency and ESG proof, paired with innovation storytelling in design and materials science.

Qualitative Lens — Lululemon (Earned Media Signals, Q2 2025)

Earned-media coverage highlights brand lifestyle and community engagement. Innovation stories are sporadic, and ESG visibility is low given category trends toward sustainability leadership.

Category Media Narrative Equity Impact
Innovation Product quality focus; limited cutting-edge tech/design emphasis Minimal lift — underleveraged competitive angle
Trust & Ethics Community building and positive brand culture Supports loyalty; transparency could lift trust
Corporate Culture Performance lifestyle image Strong aspirational positioning; exclusivity may limit reach
Community Impact Events and wellness engagement Positive local sentiment; low national/international amplification

Medium volume; lifestyle-led; innovation and ESG cues underweighted

Insight: Integrate innovation and sustainability proof into lifestyle narrative to balance aspiration with modern relevance.


Brand Equity Opportunity – Lululemon

What to Leverage:

  • Strong reputation (61.7) and brand lifestyle appeal within core segments.
  • High awareness (72%) in target markets; brand loyalty among current users.
  • Positive association with wellness and community engagement.

What to Watch:

  • Trust (27.2) and Perceived Value (31%) lag significantly; need clearer quality/value proof.
  • Innovation score (7.6) under-indexes in earned-media coverage.
  • Large non-user segment (76%) despite strong brand awareness.

Recommended Strategic Focus:
Build broader trust through transparent sourcing, quality guarantees, and sustainability leadership. Increase innovation salience with product design showcases and materials science features in campaigns targeting new users.

The Public Signal Gap Index™ (PSGI™) compares what the public thinks (survey data) with what the media says (earned media signals). This diagnostic highlights alignment—or misalignment—across trust, innovation, reputation, and perception.

BES Dimension Survey Signal Media Signal Risk Level
Trust 31% trust Positive brand culture coverage; transparency on sourcing/sustainability low High
Innovation 7.6 score Innovation cues present in product launches but not dominant in narrative High
Reputation 61.7 score Strong lifestyle/reputation framing among loyal customers Low
Perception 33.0 score Brand positioned as premium; broader lifestyle/culture connection limited High

PSGI™ compares public perception signals with earned media sentiment to detect potential brand alignment risks.
High = Significant misalignment in public vs. media signals
Moderate = Opportunity to close trust/innovation gaps
Low = Public signal and media narrative in alignment

Vuori

Vuori’s emerging profile shows strong product potential—largest lift is in trust, value clarity, and perception salience.

With 27% awareness and a high non-user base (87%), Vuori’s Brand Equity Score™ reflects an early-stage brand with headroom across every equity dimension. Priority: build trust and perceived value while engineering culturally resonant moments that scale beyond the core.

This BES snapshot highlights how targeted awareness, proof-of-quality, and community storytelling can accelerate conversion and advocacy.

— MeasuredI/O BES Insights Team

Dimension Vuori Score Category Leader Gap
Innovation 6.0 Nike – 15.6 –9.6
Trust 18.7 Levi’s – 57.4 –38.7
Perception 22.9 Levi’s – 78.9 –56.0
Reputation 58.1 Nike – 70.8 –12.7
Composite 63.4 Levi’s – 90.0 –26.6
    = Critical Gap (30+ pts)     |         = Moderate Gap (15–30 pts)

Quantitative Lens — Vuori (Q2 2025)

MeasuredI/O’s quantitative lens blends public sentiment indicators with brand engagement benchmarks to evaluate brand health. Vuori remains early-stage in national penetration: low awareness, low engagement, and large “unsure” cohorts across trust and value. NPS (+13) indicates a small but real promoter base to cultivate.

Metric Score Insight
Awareness27%Significant headroom for brand building
Favorability12%Neutral majority; conversion opportunity
Trust Index12%82% unsure — credibility story underdeveloped
Perceived Value13%Premium rationale unclear for most consumers
Brand Advocacy Index™+13 NPSEarly advocates present; expand through proof-based experience

Brand Alignment Gap Index™ (BAGI™)

High Gap observed. Public awareness and trust/value are low, and earned-media salience is minimal. Vuori needs outsized proof moments to close perception gaps quickly.

High misalignment — low share of voice and weak value clarity

Insight: Scale discovery (creators/athletes, retail partnerships), anchor value with durability/fit guarantees, and publish transparent sourcing/ESG to build trust.

Qualitative Lens — Vuori (Earned Media Signals, Q2 2025)

Coverage volume is low; narratives skew lifestyle and comfort with few breakthrough tech or community stories. To cut through, Vuori must deliberately engineer “moments” that travel beyond the core.

Category Media Narrative Equity Impact
Innovation Comfort/fit emphasis; limited materials-science storytelling Minimal lift — introduce tech proof points
Trust & Ethics Brand ethos positive; sourcing/ESG not visible Trust suppressed by uncertainty
Corporate Culture Emerging lifestyle brand identity Appeal among early adopters; lacks scale cues
Community Impact Few publicized local partnerships Underleveraged for reputation and discovery

Low-to-medium volume; lifestyle-led; needs tech and community “proof”

Insight: Pair product-tech demos and athlete validation with localized wellness/community programs to raise trust and perception simultaneously.


Brand Equity Opportunity – Vuori

What to Leverage:

  • Distinct comfort/fit proposition in athleisure; early advocates (NPS +13).
  • Clean, modern brand world with lifestyle relevance.
  • Agility to test creator/retail partnerships and localized activations.

What to Watch:

  • Trust (18.7) and Perception (22.9) significantly trail category leaders.
  • Low earned share of voice; minimal innovation/ESG proof in market.
  • High non-user base (87%) despite premium price positioning.

Recommended Strategic Focus:
Accelerate awareness via creator/athlete seeding and retail expansions; launch proof-led campaigns (durability/fit guarantees, lab tests) to clarify value; publish transparent ESG and sourcing. Engineer cultural “moments” (collabs, events) to raise perception and conversion.

The Public Signal Gap Index™ (PSGI™) compares what the public thinks (survey data) with what the media says (earned media signals). This diagnostic highlights alignment—or misalignment—across trust, innovation, reputation, and perception.

BES Dimension Survey Signal Media Signal Risk Level
Trust 12% trust Positive brand tone but scarce sourcing/ESG proof; credibility unformed High
Innovation 6.0 score Comfort narrative dominates; limited materials-science/tech storytelling High
Reputation 58.1 score Positive lifestyle framing among early adopters Low
Perception 22.9 score Low share of voice; limited cultural resonance beyond niche High

PSGI™ compares public perception signals with earned media sentiment to detect potential brand alignment risks.
High = Significant misalignment in public vs. media signals
Moderate = Opportunity to close trust/innovation gaps
Low = Public signal and media narrative in alignment

Brand Equity Score™ reflects publicly available signals captured via Morning Consult (quantitative survey indicators) and Meltwater (earned media analytics), combined with MeasuredI/O’s proprietary scoring methodology. All trademarks and brand names are the property of their respective owners. This analysis is interpretive and for informational purposes only.

Who's Winning in

retail?

A Comprehensive Benchmark Built on Real-World Signals & Public Opinion

Q2 2025 Brand Equity Score™ – Retail Top 5

Rank Brand Composite BES™ Innovation Trust Perception Reputation
1 Costco 88.1 86878594
2 Walmart 86.8 83868488
3 The Home Depot 82.0 80848282
4 Kohl’s 71.2 68727075
5 Macy’s 69.5 66696875
High (85+) Moderate (70–84.9) Low (<70)

Dig Deeper: Brand-by-Brand Analysis

Click any brand to view its full profile, including quantitative insights from public surveys and qualitative signals from media sentiment.

Costco

Costco turns loyalty and membership value into unmatched retail advocacy.

With a reputation anchored in value, trust, and member satisfaction, Costco leads the retail category on advocacy and long-term reputation. The Brand Equity Score™ reflects a balanced profile — high trust, strong perception, and industry-leading reputation, backed by one of the highest Net Promoter Scores in retail.

This BES snapshot shows why Costco’s member-first model delivers durable brand equity while leaving only a narrow innovation perception gap to close.

— MeasuredI/O BES Insights Team

Dimension Costco Score Category Leader Gap
Innovation 86 Walmart – 88 –2
Trust 87 Costco – 87
Perception 85 Costco – 85
Reputation 94 Costco – 94
Composite 88.1 88.1
    = Critical Gap (30+ pts)     |         = Moderate Gap (15–30 pts)

Quantitative Lens — Costco (Q2 2025)

MeasuredI/O’s quantitative lens blends public sentiment indicators with brand engagement benchmarks to evaluate brand health. Costco’s profile is defined by industry-leading advocacy, strong trust, and a reputation reinforced by its value-driven membership model.

Metric Score Insight
Awareness94%Near-universal brand familiarity among U.S. consumers
Favorability66%Strong goodwill from loyal membership base
Trust Index87%High trust driven by consistent value and service
Perceived Value64%Reputation for quality + savings via membership model
Brand Advocacy Index™+46Exceptional NPS reflecting strong customer loyalty

Brand Alignment Gap Index™ (BAGI™)

Minor Gaps present. Innovation perception trails slightly behind peers, but trust, perception, and reputation remain fully aligned.

Moderate alignment — high trust/reputation, slight innovation gap

Insight: Leveraging technology and sustainability leadership in communications could close the innovation perception gap without sacrificing Costco’s trusted value narrative.

Qualitative Lens — Costco (Earned Media Signals, Q2 2025)

Costco’s earned media narrative is dominated by value leadership, member benefits, and operational efficiency, with strong sentiment lift from community and sustainability stories.

Category Media Narrative Equity Impact
Innovation Operational efficiency, selective tech adoption Moderate lift — less visible than value stories
Trust & Ethics Consistent pricing, member-first policies Strengthens category-leading trust
Corporate Culture Employee loyalty, strong workplace reputation Reinforces trust and perception
Community Impact Charitable giving, disaster relief Positive local and national sentiment

High volume, value-led narrative with strong trust and advocacy reinforcement

Insight: Innovation messaging, particularly around sustainability and digital experience, could elevate Costco’s already strong equity profile.


Brand Equity Opportunity – Costco

What to Leverage:

  • Category-leading trust (87%) and reputation (94) cement Costco’s value and loyalty advantage.
  • Strong perception (85) supported by consistent member benefits and service quality.
  • High NPS (+46) reflects exceptional advocacy potential.

What to Watch:

  • Innovation perception (86) slightly trails leaders, leaving a modest perception gap.
  • Media narratives focus heavily on value, with less visibility for tech or sustainability leadership.
  • Employer brand admiration split (50/50), indicating room for cultural storytelling.

Recommended Strategic Focus:
Continue leveraging Costco’s trust and value dominance while closing the small innovation gap through sustainability and tech-forward narratives. Amplifying employer brand strengths will further cement its leadership in retail equity.

The Public Signal Gap Index™ (PSGI™) compares what the public thinks (survey data) with what the media says (earned media signals). This diagnostic highlights alignment—or misalignment—across trust, innovation, reputation, and perception.

BES Dimension Survey Signal Media Signal Risk Level
Trust 87% trust Consistent value + member-first policies in coverage Low
Innovation 86 score Operational efficiency + sustainability tech stories Moderate
Reputation 94 score Positive sentiment + loyalty-driven narratives Low
Perception 85 score Value leadership framing in media Low

PSGI™ compares public perception signals with earned media sentiment to detect potential brand alignment risks.
Moderate = Opportunity to realign narrative and close trust/innovation gaps
Low = Public signal and media narrative in alignment

Walmart

Walmart converts unmatched market penetration into scale-driven value leadership.

With near-universal awareness and a powerful value proposition, Walmart dominates U.S. retail in accessibility and price perception. The Brand Equity Score™ shows strong trust, broad perception strength, and a reputation built on consistency — while highlighting a modest innovation perception gap to close.

This BES snapshot illustrates Walmart’s scale advantage and community impact leadership, with headroom to amplify innovation and employer brand appeal.

— MeasuredI/O BES Insights Team

Dimension Walmart Score Category Leader Gap
Innovation 88 Walmart – 88
Trust 84 Costco – 87 –3
Perception 83 Costco – 85 –2
Reputation 86 Costco – 94 –8
Composite 85.3 88.1 –2.8
    = Critical Gap (30+ pts)     |         = Moderate Gap (15–30 pts)

Quantitative Lens — Walmart (Q2 2025)

MeasuredI/O’s quantitative lens blends public sentiment indicators with brand engagement benchmarks to evaluate brand health. Walmart delivers consistent strength in value perception and community impact, paired with high awareness and broad market reach.

Metric Score Insight
Awareness97%Near-universal recognition across demographics
Favorability78%Strong appeal with opportunity to convert neutrals
Trust Index84%Confidence in pricing, selection, and convenience
Perceived Value75%Market leader in value perception
Brand Advocacy Index™+32Healthy advocacy with room to strengthen loyalty

Brand Alignment Gap Index™ (BAGI™)

Minor Gaps present. Trust and perception trail slightly behind leaders, and reputation lags Costco by a notable margin.

Moderate alignment — high awareness and value strength, modest trust/reputation gap

Insight: Closing trust and reputation gaps through visible ESG efforts, innovation storytelling, and employer brand elevation can further consolidate Walmart’s leadership.

Qualitative Lens — Walmart (Earned Media Signals, Q2 2025)

Walmart’s earned media profile emphasizes value, convenience, and supply chain scale. ESG and innovation narratives are present but underweighted compared to operational dominance stories.

Category Media Narrative Equity Impact
Innovation E-commerce expansion, automation Moderate lift — overshadowed by value stories
Trust & Ethics Community giving, disaster relief Strengthens community perception
Corporate Culture Mixed coverage on labor practices Opportunity to strengthen employer brand
Community Impact National/local partnerships Drives positive sentiment

High volume, value-led narrative, limited innovation coverage

Insight: Increasing the weight of innovation and ESG narratives could elevate Walmart’s perception and reputation scores.


Brand Equity Opportunity – Walmart

What to Leverage:

  • Ubiquity + Value Leadership: Near-universal awareness (97%) and category-best value perception power mass reach and frequency.
  • Omnichannel Scale: E-commerce, curbside, and last-mile capabilities create convenience advantages to translate into perception gains.
  • Community Footprint: National/local partnerships and disaster relief drive positive community sentiment that can be amplified.
  • Data & Personalization: Rich transaction data enables segmented offers to convert neutrals and increase basket size.

What to Watch:

  • Trust/Reputation delta vs. Costco: Perceived labor/ESG gaps can suppress reputation despite operational wins.
  • Innovation Salience: Automation and marketplace growth are underweighted in public narrative versus “everyday low price.”
  • Experience Consistency: Store-level variability and service pain points can cap advocacy and NPS growth.
  • Employer Brand: Split admiration indicates retention/talent risks without clearer mobility and culture stories.

Recommended Strategic Focus:
Convert scale into signal. Elevate proof-points on innovation (automation, AI-assortment, last-mile), and publish frequent, verified ESG progress to close trust/reputation gaps. Use precision loyalty (personalized offers, Walmart+ benefits storytelling) to move the neutral middle and raise frequency among light shoppers. Operationally, prioritize in-store consistency and frontline empowerment to lift experience scores at the tail. Employer brand: highlight career ladders and community impact to strengthen pride and retention.

The Public Signal Gap Index™ (PSGI™) compares what the public thinks (survey data) with what the media says (earned media signals). This diagnostic highlights alignment—or misalignment—across trust, innovation, reputation, and perception.

BES Dimension Survey Signal Media Signal Risk Level
Trust 84% trust Community and value-led coverage, occasional labor scrutiny Moderate
Innovation 88 score E-commerce growth, automation stories present but not dominant Low
Reputation 86 score Positive value-led framing, limited innovation emphasis Moderate
Perception 83 score Strong value framing, modest ESG narrative penetration Moderate

PSGI™ compares public perception signals with earned media sentiment to detect potential brand alignment risks.
Moderate = Opportunity to realign narrative and close trust/innovation gaps
Low = Public signal and media narrative in alignment

The Home Depot

Home Depot blends near-universal awareness with trusted expertise and project leadership.

As the go-to brand for home improvement, Home Depot scores high on trust, value perception, and community impact. The Brand Equity Score™ shows a balanced profile with strong advocacy, while revealing an opportunity to further amplify innovation narratives and close moderate trust/perception gaps.

This BES snapshot shows why Home Depot’s reliability and service orientation anchor its category leadership, with room to expand cultural relevance and customer engagement.

— MeasuredI/O BES Insights Team

Dimension Home Depot Score Category Leader Gap
Innovation 85 Walmart – 88 –3
Trust 84 Costco – 87 –3
Perception 84 Costco – 85 –1
Reputation 87 Costco – 94 –7
Composite 85.0 88.1 –3.1
    = Critical Gap (30+ pts)     |         = Moderate Gap (15–30 pts)

Quantitative Lens — Home Depot (Q2 2025)

MeasuredI/O’s quantitative lens blends public sentiment indicators with brand engagement benchmarks to evaluate brand health. Home Depot delivers strength in trust, perceived value, and community impact, with broad awareness and a strong reputation in home improvement expertise.

Metric Score Insight
Awareness95%Nearly universal recognition
Favorability76%High consumer goodwill
Trust Index84%Strong integrity and reliability perception
Perceived Value70%Clear price-quality advantage
Brand Advocacy Index™+35Solid advocacy from loyal customers

Brand Alignment Gap Index™ (BAGI™)

Minor Gaps in reputation and innovation perception compared to leaders.

Strong alignment — home improvement expertise solidifies trust; innovation could be more visible

Insight: Elevating innovation and ESG storytelling will reinforce Home Depot’s leadership and relevance.

Qualitative Lens — Home Depot (Earned Media Signals, Q2 2025)

Home Depot’s earned media profile emphasizes expertise, community involvement, and value, with less emphasis on innovation narratives.

Category Media Narrative Equity Impact
Innovation Tool rental expansion, online service enhancements Moderate lift — overshadowed by operational stories
Trust & Ethics Positive community engagement coverage Strengthens trust leadership
Corporate Culture Mixed coverage of workplace practices Opportunity to build employer brand
Community Impact National projects, local partnerships Boosts perception and advocacy

Strong reliability and value narrative; innovation underweighted

Insight: A more innovation-forward media strategy could close minor perception gaps and expand relevance.


Brand Equity Opportunity – Home Depot

What to Leverage:

  • Project Authority: Trusted expertise, tool rental, and how-to guidance create defensible differentiation vs. general retailers.
  • Strong Value + Trust: Clear price-quality equation and community programs drive dependable goodwill.
  • Pro/DIY Flywheel: Pro services and DIY education reinforce frequency and multi-category attachment.
  • Omnichannel Readiness: BOPIS/curbside and inventory visibility enhance convenience for time-sensitive projects.

What to Watch:

  • Innovation Visibility: Digital improvements and tool ecosystem advances are under-recognized in media vs. operational stories.
  • Reputation Gap vs. Leader: Costco’s loyalty halo compresses relative reputation; elevate distinctive strengths (expert help, pro services).
  • Employer Perception: Mixed workplace coverage can dampen advocacy; spotlight training and advancement outcomes.
  • Younger/Urban Penetration: Lighter awareness/usage in dense markets limits growth for small-space, renter segments.

Recommended Strategic Focus:
Make expertise visible. Scale content and partnerships (creators, trades) that dramatize project outcomes, speed, and savings. Package innovation proof-points (visual search, project calculators, connected tools) into consumer-friendly narratives. Expand small-space/project bundles and micro-formats to win urban renters. Strengthen employer brand by showcasing certifications, pay-progression, and community volunteerism to lift pride and reputation simultaneously.

The Public Signal Gap Index™ (PSGI™) compares what the public thinks (survey data) with what the media says (earned media signals). This diagnostic highlights alignment—or misalignment—across trust, innovation, reputation, and perception.

BES Dimension Survey Signal Media Signal Risk Level
Trust 84% trust Community and service stories dominate Low
Innovation 85 score Tool rentals, digital integration, not core narrative Moderate
Reputation 87 score Strong reliability focus, limited ESG media lift Moderate
Perception 84 score Operational competence leads, fewer cultural stories Moderate

PSGI™ compares public perception signals with earned media sentiment to detect potential brand alignment risks.
Moderate = Opportunity to realign narrative and close trust/innovation gaps
Low = Public signal and media narrative in alignment

Kohl's

Kohl’s combines strong recognition with an urgent need to close engagement and trust gaps.

Kohl’s enjoys high national awareness and a solid base of favorability, but a sizable non-user segment and muted innovation salience limit growth. The Brand Equity Score™ highlights opportunities to clarify value, amplify community and ESG efforts, and energize a neutral middle that is yet to fully connect with the brand.

This BES snapshot points to a dual play: deepen existing customer relationships through exclusivity and omni-convenience, while reinvigorating relevance for neutrals and lapsed shoppers.

— MeasuredI/O BES Insights Team

Dimension Kohl’s Score Category Leader Gap
Innovation 79 Walmart – 88 –9
Trust 76 Costco – 87 –11
Perception 75 Costco – 85 –10
Reputation 77 Costco – 94 –17
Composite 76.8 88.1 –11.3
    = Critical Gap (30+ pts)     |         = Moderate Gap (15–30 pts)

Quantitative Lens — Kohl’s (Q2 2025)

MeasuredI/O’s quantitative lens blends public sentiment indicators with brand engagement benchmarks to evaluate brand health. Kohl’s exhibits high awareness and solid favorability, yet large opportunity gaps in usage and advocacy signal that brand strength is underleveraged.

Metric Score Insight
Awareness93%National household recognition
Favorability63%Solid baseline goodwill; potential in neutral segment
Trust Index76%Confidence trails retail leaders
Perceived Value59%Price–benefit message lacks distinctiveness
Brand Advocacy Index™+21Moderate NPS; loyalty potential untapped

Brand Alignment Gap Index™ (BAGI™)

Moderate Gaps in trust, reputation, and perception versus retail category leaders. Innovation stories exist but lack cultural weight.

Moderate alignment — improve value clarity and bring ESG, exclusivity, and experience to the forefront.

Insight: Target neutral and lapsed customers with proof of exclusivity, convenience, and local impact. Close the perception gap by linking promotions to quality and ESG stories.

Qualitative Lens — Kohl’s (Earned Media Signals, Q2 2025)

Kohl’s earned media narrative centers on seasonal promotions, partnerships, and loyalty offers. ESG and innovation coverage is sparse, diluting long-term equity building.

Category Media Narrative Equity Impact
Innovation Store refreshes, digital upgrades Light lift — not yet a defining brand pillar
Trust & Ethics Occasional community and ESG mentions Mixed influence; lacks sustained storytelling
Corporate Culture Minimal employer brand presence Underplays career growth and employee pride
Community Impact Partnerships and sponsorships present but low-amplification Positive yet low visibility

Medium volume; promotion-led story crowds out values and innovation narratives

Insight: Increase media weight on ESG, exclusive product collaborations, and convenience innovations to shift brand narrative.


Brand Equity Opportunity – Kohl’s

What to Leverage:

  • Broad Awareness: 93% recognition ensures a wide entry funnel.
  • Promotions & Partnerships: Seasonal offers and alliances create timely foot traffic.
  • Value Positioning: Solid price perception can be enhanced with quality and exclusivity cues.
  • Community Presence: Existing local sponsorships provide a base for stronger ESG equity.

What to Watch:

  • Engagement Gap: Nearly half of aware consumers are non-users.
  • Trust & ESG Narrative: Sparse values-driven media limits emotional connection.
  • Employer Brand: Low employee pride affects both talent and customer perception.
  • Innovation Salience: Lacks a signature experience or product differentiator in media coverage.

Recommended Strategic Focus:
Convert awareness into active loyalty through omnichannel upgrades, exclusive brand launches, and hyper-local community engagement. Tie promotions to quality and ESG proof points to lift trust and perception. Introduce high-visibility partnerships or experiences that can serve as cultural “moments” and reinvigorate the brand story across channels.

The Public Signal Gap Index™ (PSGI™) compares what the public thinks (survey data) with what the media says (earned media signals). This diagnostic highlights alignment—or misalignment—across trust, innovation, reputation, and perception.

BES Dimension Survey Signal Media Signal Risk Level
Trust 76% trust Values and ESG coverage light; promotion-led stories dominate Moderate
Innovation 79 score Store refreshes and tech upgrades receive minimal amplification Low
Reputation 77 score Solid consumer sentiment; limited reinforcement in media Moderate
Perception 75 score Media framing leans transactional vs. aspirational Moderate

PSGI™ compares public perception signals with earned media sentiment to detect potential brand alignment risks.
Moderate = Opportunity to realign narrative and close trust/innovation gaps
Low = Public signal and media narrative in alignment

Macy's

Macy’s pairs iconic awareness with a value-and-experience refresh opportunity.

With strong national recognition and solid favorability, Macy’s remains a cornerstone of U.S. department store retail. The Brand Equity Score™ indicates dependable reputation and trust foundations, while spotlighting room to elevate innovation salience and convert a large neutral middle into active advocates.

This BES snapshot underscores Macy’s path: modernize the story (innovation, omnichannel, exclusive brands), amplify community impact, and convert passive familiarity into usage and loyalty.

— MeasuredI/O BES Insights Team

Dimension Macy’s Score Category Leader Gap
Innovation 82 Walmart – 88 –6
Trust 78 Costco – 87 –9
Perception 77 Costco – 85 –8
Reputation 80 Costco – 94 –14
Composite 79.2 88.1 –8.9
    = Critical Gap (30+ pts)     |         = Moderate Gap (15–30 pts)

Quantitative Lens — Macy’s (Q2 2025)

MeasuredI/O’s quantitative lens blends public sentiment indicators with brand engagement benchmarks to evaluate brand health. Macy’s shows strong awareness and solid favorability, with clear opportunities to reinforce trust, sharpen value storytelling, and increase engagement among neutral consumers.

Metric Score Insight
Awareness94%Iconic national recognition
Favorability61%Solid goodwill; large “no opinion” segment to convert
Trust Index78%Confidence is present but under-communicated
Perceived Value55%Mixed clarity on price–quality equation
Brand Advocacy Index™+22Moderate NPS; room to cultivate promoters

Brand Alignment Gap Index™ (BAGI™)

Moderate Gaps across trust, perception, and reputation relative to retail leaders. Innovation visibility exists but is not yet a core equity driver.

Moderate alignment — brand is well-known; elevate proof of value, experience, and exclusivity to move neutrals.

Insight: Clarify value beyond price (exclusive brands, curated experiences, seamless omni). Pair with visible ESG and employer brand progress to strengthen trust and reputation.

Qualitative Lens — Macy’s (Earned Media Signals, Q2 2025)

Macy’s earned media narrative centers on promotions, assortment, and heritage events, with growing coverage of omnichannel experiences. Innovation and ESG stories appear but are not yet dominant.

Category Media Narrative Equity Impact
Innovation Omnichannel upgrades, experiential retail pilots Light lift — overshadowed by promotion-led coverage
Trust & Ethics Occasional ESG and community initiatives Mixed impact; room for consistent proof-points
Corporate Culture Employer brand stories under-amplified Opportunity to drive pride and retention
Community Impact Heritage events + local partnerships Positive but not top-of-mind

Medium volume, promotion-led narrative; innovation and ESG require stronger storytelling

Insight: Shift share-of-voice from discounts to differentiated experiences and values to boost perception and reputation.


Brand Equity Opportunity – Macy’s

What to Leverage:

  • Iconic Awareness: 94% recognition creates a powerful top-of-funnel platform.
  • Curated Differentiation: Exclusive labels and event heritage (e.g., tentpole brand moments) can shift narrative beyond promotions.
  • Omnichannel Progress: Seamless buy-online-pickup and experience upgrades build convenience equity.
  • Community Equity: Local partnerships and philanthropy drive positive sentiment when consistently surfaced.

What to Watch:

  • Neutral Middle: Large “no opinion” segment suppresses perception and reputation.
  • Value Clarity: Price promotions overshadow quality, exclusivity, and service proof-points.
  • Employer Brand: Under-told culture and mobility stories limit advocacy and talent attraction.
  • Innovation Salience: Omnichannel and experiential investments remain underweighted in media narrative.

Recommended Strategic Focus:
Rebalance the story from discount-first to distinctive value. Spotlight exclusive brands, fit/quality guarantees, and omni convenience in always-on storytelling. Package innovation proof (experience upgrades, digital convenience) into consumer-friendly content. Elevate employer brand via career-path transparency and associate spotlights. Localize community impact narratives to move the neutral middle and lift trust, perception, and reputation simultaneously.

The Public Signal Gap Index™ (PSGI™) compares what the public thinks (survey data) with what the media says (earned media signals). This diagnostic highlights alignment—or misalignment—across trust, innovation, reputation, and perception.

BES Dimension Survey Signal Media Signal Risk Level
Trust 78% trust ESG/community stories sporadic; promotion-led narrative dominates Moderate
Innovation 82 score Omnichannel/experience upgrades appear but lack consistent weight Low
Reputation 80 score Heritage positive; advocacy capped by discount-centric framing Moderate
Perception 77 score Promotions overshadow exclusivity/experience stories Moderate

PSGI™ compares public perception signals with earned media sentiment to detect potential brand alignment risks.
Moderate = Opportunity to realign narrative and close trust/innovation gaps
Low = Public signal and media narrative in alignment

Brand Equity Score™ reflects publicly available signals captured via Morning Consult (quantitative survey indicators) and Meltwater (earned media analytics), combined with MeasuredI/O’s proprietary scoring methodology. All trademarks and brand names are the property of their respective owners. This analysis is interpretive and for informational purposes only.

Want More?

Go Deeper with BES™ Insights

  • Public opinion deep cutsstyle relevance, quality/durability, value, size inclusivity, sustainability; brand vs private-label dynamics.
  • Earned media intelligence — drops/collabs, creator programs, labor practices, store vs DTC narrative; outlet tone & velocity.
  • Gap diagnostics — when media buzz is high but value or durability trails, find the lever that moves Perception/Trust.

See Your Score & Benchmark

  • Request your brand’s BES™ — composite and four pillars to your inbox.
  • Compare vs peers — includes 2–3 peer picks and where you lead/lag.
  • Get the Industry Top 10 — leaders, movers, and signal gaps in one PDF.
  • Line / collection splits — core vs collab vs premium; store vs DTC channel effects.
Trust Innovation Perception Reputation

We’ll reply quickly—just the numbers and what they mean.

Reputation is no longer optional.

It’s measurable. It’s manageable. And it’s now a competitive edge you can prove.

What Sets Us Apart:

=> Signal-driven: We blend media momentum and public sentiment into one unified score that tracks brand health.

=> 4D clarity: Innovation, Trust, Perception, and Reputation — easy to grasp, hard to ignore.

=> Action-ready: Built for comms leaders, brand strategists, and execs who need clarity — not dashboards full of noise.


The Brand Equity Score™ blends what people say with what’s being said — so you know exactly where your brand stands, and what to do next.

Where do you rank?

  Get My Score!

Yes, Let's Talk

I would like to know more about

The Brand Equity Score™


Yes, Let's Talk

I would like to know more about

The Brand Equity Score™


measuredI/O, LLC. 2025. All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy & Terms of Use

Yes, Let's Talk

I would like to know more about

The Brand Equity Score™